Principle: A person has no legal remedy for an injury caused by an act to which he hasconsented.Facts: 'R', a cricket enthusiast, purchases a ticket to watch a T20 match organised by the IndianPremier League (IPL). During the match, a ball struck for six hits 'R' on his body. and injureshim. He sues IPL for compensation for the medical expenses.Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?

Question

TuteeHUB · Accepted Answer

IPL would be liable as it did not ensure that the spectators were protected from the risk ofnsuch injuries

TuteeHUB · Answer

'R' should be compensated as he purchased the ticket to get entertainment and not to getninjured

TuteeHUB · Answer

'R' would fail in his action, as he voluntarily exposed himself to the risk

TuteeHUB · Answer

None of the above

1.	Principle: A person has no legal remedy for an injury caused by an act to which he hasconsented.Facts: 'R', a cricket enthusiast, purchases a ticket to watch a T20 match organised by the IndianPremier League (IPL). During the match, a ball struck for six hits 'R' on his body. and injureshim. He sues IPL for compensation for the medical expenses.Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?
A.	'R' should be compensated as he purchased the ticket to get entertainment and not to getninjured
B.	'R' would fail in his action, as he voluntarily exposed himself to the risk
C.	IPL would be liable as it did not ensure that the spectators were protected from the risk ofnsuch injuries
D.	None of the above
Answer» C. IPL would be liable as it did not ensure that the spectators were protected from the risk ofnsuch injuries

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

Reply to Comment