The basic stress in masonry units having height to width ratio of 1.5 may be increased by a factor of

The basic stress in masonry units having height to width ratio of 1.5

1.	The basic stress in masonry units having height to width ratio of 1.5 may be increased by a factor of
A.	0.2
B.	0.4
C.	0.6
D.	0
Answer» D. 0

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

A free standing brick wall 20 cm thick is subjected to a wind pressure of 75kg/m . The maximum height of wall from stability consideration is
If the horizontal cross-sectional area of a wall is 1200 cm , then the basic stress shall be multiplied by a reduction factor equal to
Which of the following will give higher ratio of brickwork strength to mortar strength ?
Where a structural component or a system is providing lateral support to five or more walls or columns, the lateral load to be resisted may be taken as_______________?
Water retentivity for brick masonry should not be less than__________________?
The use of relatively weak mortar_______________?_x005F_x000D_Consider the following statements._x005F_x000D_1. will accommodate movements due to loads and, cracking if any, and will be distributed as thin hair cracks which are less noticeable or harmful._x005F_x000D_2. will result in reduction of stresses due to differential expansion of masonry units._x005F_x000D_select the correct statements.
The timber floor not spanning on the masonry wall but properly anchored to the wall gives________________?
The thickness of each leaf of a cavity wall shall not be less than_________________?
The mortars used for masonry construction are classified based on strength in IS 2250 and IS 1905 according to their designations L1,L2, H1, H2, M, M2._x005F_x000D_The correct sequence of increasing order of their strengths is?
The mode of failure of a very short masonry member having h/t ratio of less than 4 is by _______________?

The basic stress in masonry units having height to width ratio of 1.5 may be increased by a factor of

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

Reply to Comment