Assertion (A): In Minerva Mills v. Union of India, Art.31 C as amended by the Constitution (Forty second Amendment) Act, 1976 was held invalid. Reason (R): The amendment of Art. 31 C destroyed the basic structure of the Constitution.

Question

TuteeHUB · Accepted Answer

Both A and R are individually true but R is not the correct explanation of A

TuteeHUB · Answer

Both A and R are individually true and R is the correct explanation of A

TuteeHUB · Answer

A is true but R is false

TuteeHUB · Answer

A is false but R is true

1.	Assertion (A): In Minerva Mills v. Union of India, Art.31 C as amended by the Constitution (Forty second Amendment) Act, 1976 was held invalid. Reason (R): The amendment of Art. 31 C destroyed the basic structure of the Constitution.
A.	Both A and R are individually true and R is the correct explanation of A
B.	Both A and R are individually true but R is not the correct explanation of A
C.	A is true but R is false
D.	A is false but R is true
Answer» B. Both A and R are individually true but R is not the correct explanation of A

Assertion (A): In Minerva Mills v. Union of India, Art.31 C as amended by the Constitution (Forty second Amendment) Act, 1976 was held invalid. Reason (R): The amendment of Art. 31 C destroyed the basic structure of the Constitution.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

Reply to Comment