

MCQOPTIONS
Saved Bookmarks
This section includes 92 Mcqs, each offering curated multiple-choice questions to sharpen your Logical and Verbal Reasoning knowledge and support exam preparation. Choose a topic below to get started.
51. |
In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement: Should zoos be closed down?Argument I: Yes, imprisoning animals is unethical.Argument II: No, it is fine if some animals are kept in captivity for sake of entertainment. |
A. | Only argument I is strong. |
B. | Only argument II is strong. |
C. | Both I and II are strong. |
D. | Neither I nor II is strong. |
Answer» B. Only argument II is strong. | |
52. |
Each question given below consists of a stamen, followed by two arguments numbered I & II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong argument’.Statement:Is global warming a real threat?Arguments:I. Yes, it is a threat leading to the consequences of sea level rise, extreme heat, heightened wildlife risk, and drought and other water supply issues.II. No Global warming is misconception created by some people. |
A. | Only argument II is strong |
B. | Neither I nor II is strong and |
C. | Only argument I is strong |
D. | Both I and II are strong |
Answer» D. Both I and II are strong | |
53. |
A statement is followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is / are strong with respect to the statement.Statement:Should government run campaigns to create mass awareness to use fuel responsibly?Arguments:I. Yes, awareness is needed about the amount of natural resources used to generate electricity. This will create a sense of responsibility in the citizens.II. No, urbanisation has made people get used to comforts. It is very difficult to educate the massand from discipline. |
A. | Both I and II are strong. |
B. | Only argument II is strong. |
C. | Only argument I is strong |
D. | Neither I nor II is strong |
Answer» D. Neither I nor II is strong | |
54. |
Direction: The question consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given argument is strong and which argument is weak.Statement: Should Yoga and meditation be made compulsory in schools?Arguments: I. Yes. Yoga and meditation help the students to have better concentration which eventually helps in their studies.II. No. Children are already occupied with so much work and they can’t dedicate their valuable time to Yoga and meditation. |
A. | Neither argument I nor argument II is strong. |
B. | Both arguments I and II are strong. |
C. | Only argument I is strong. |
D. | Only argument II is strong. |
Answer» D. Only argument II is strong. | |
55. |
Consider the given argument and decide which of the given assumptions is (are) implicit.Argument:All the faculty members are instructed to reach the college by 9.00 A.M every day.Assumptions:Some faculty members do not come on time.Faculty members will follow all the instructions in the notice. |
A. | Only assumption 1 implicit. |
B. | Both 1 and 2 are implicit. |
C. | Neither 1 nor 2 is implicit. |
D. | Only assumption 2 implicit. |
Answer» C. Neither 1 nor 2 is implicit. | |
56. |
A statement is followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement.Statement:From tender age children must be trained to do household chores.Arguments:I. Yes, it will make them grow responsible for their work.II. No, it is enough that we send them to school as they learn everything there. |
A. | Neither I nor II is strong. |
B. | Only argument I is strong. |
C. | Only argument II is strong. |
D. | Both I and II are strong. |
Answer» C. Only argument II is strong. | |
57. |
Given is a question followed by two arguments numbered I and II. Read the question and decide which of the arguments is strong with respect to the question.Question:Should shifting agriculture be practiced?Arguments:I. No. It is not a worthy practice.II. Yes. When compared to modern methods of farming, it is less expensive. |
A. | Only argument II is strong. |
B. | Only argument I is strong. |
C. | Neither argument I nor II is strong. |
D. | Either argument I or II is strong. |
Answer» B. Only argument I is strong. | |
58. |
A statement is followed by two argument. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement.Statement:Should too much revealing dress be banned?Argument:1. Yes, it disturbs the people and create abuse.2) No, wearing cloths of their choice is the fundamental right of the individual. |
A. | Neither argument 1 and 2 is strong |
B. | Only argument 1 is strong |
C. | Only argument 2 is strong |
D. | Either argument 1 or 2 is strong |
Answer» D. Either argument 1 or 2 is strong | |
59. |
In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement: Should one year of army training be compulsory for all Indian citizens?Argument I: No, the costs of training will be prohibitive and one year of labour will be lost.Argument II: Yes, army training helps make better citizens. |
A. | If only argument I is strong. |
B. | If only argument II is strong. |
C. | If both I and II are strong. |
D. | If neither I nor II is strong. |
Answer» B. If only argument II is strong. | |
60. |
Directions: In the question given below a statement is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is the ‘weak’ argument.Statement: Should every citizen who criticize his own country be termed as traitor? Argument I: Yes. If someone is criticizing his own country it is probably because he does not respect its values. Argument II: No. Everyone has a right to express their view and expressing your own view does not make anyone a traitor. |
A. | Only argument I is strong |
B. | Only argument II is strong |
C. | Either I or II is strong |
D. | Neither I nor II is strong |
E. | Both I and II are strong |
Answer» C. Either I or II is strong | |
61. |
Given below is a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. Which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement.Statement:Should the government coal mines to private players.Arguments:I. Yes. Many large industrial houses have sent in proposals to buy coal blocks.II. No. Only some industrial houses will win the bids. |
A. | Both the arguments are strong |
B. | Only argument I is strong |
C. | Only argument II is strong |
D. | Neither argument I nor II is strong |
Answer» D. Neither argument I nor II is strong | |
62. |
In the question, a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement: Should rock shows be allowed to run until midnight at tourist places?Argument I: Yes, more tourists arrive due to rock shows. Tourism is good for the local economy.Argument II: No, local traditions are harmed due to tourism. |
A. | If only argument I is strong. |
B. | If only argument II is strong. |
C. | If both I and II are strong. |
D. | If neither I nor II is strong. |
Answer» B. If only argument II is strong. | |
63. |
A statement is followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement.Statement:The good aspects of edible oils are retained only when extracted by traditional cold pressed methods.Arguments:I. Yes, recent research says oil extracted by old method is good for health.II. No, the cold pressed oil is very costly and not affordable for common public |
A. | Only argument II is strong. |
B. | Both arguments I and II are strong |
C. | Only argument I is strong. |
D. | Neither I nor II is strong. |
Answer» D. Neither I nor II is strong. | |
64. |
Consider the argument and decide which of the given assumptions is (are) implicit.Argument:The present government had reduced the base price for auctioning for the 2G spectrum.Assumptions:1. Next time price will reduce further.2. Last time the auction was not good. |
A. | Neither 1 nor 2 is implicit |
B. | Only assumption 2 is implicit |
C. | Both 1 and 2 are implicit |
D. | Only assumption 1 is implicit |
Answer» C. Both 1 and 2 are implicit | |
65. |
A question is given below and followed by two arguments. Determine which argument is/ are strong in the context of the question.Question: Should schools engage students in the task of cleaning the schools?Argument 1: Yes, schools should exercise their control and power over students.Argument 2: No. This will affect the time allotted for the academic study of the students. |
A. | Only argument 1 is strong. |
B. | Only argument 2 is strong. |
C. | Either argument 1 or argument 2 is strong. |
D. | Both arguments 1 and 2 are not strong. |
Answer» C. Either argument 1 or argument 2 is strong. | |
66. |
A statement is followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement.Statement:One electric unit saved is equal to production of two unitsArgument:I. Yes, power consumption is easier than productionII. No, we can consume power nowadays without the view on production |
A. | Only argument I is strong |
B. | Neither I nor II is strong |
C. | Only argument II is strong |
D. | Either I or II is strong |
Answer» B. Neither I nor II is strong | |
67. |
Directions: In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement: Should street lights be switched off after midnight?Argument I: No, statistics show that crime and accidents will increase if the street lights are switched off.Argument II: Yes, since fewer vehicles ply after midnight, expensive electricity will be wasted. |
A. | Only argument I is strong. |
B. | Only argument II is strong. |
C. | Both I and II are strong. |
D. | Neither I nor II is strong. |
Answer» B. Only argument II is strong. | |
68. |
In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement: Should cameras be installed in public school class-rooms to monitor teachers?Argument I: No, This will violate privacy norms.Argument II: Yes, This will make teachers more accountable, increasing their productivity. |
A. | if only argument I is strong. |
B. | if neither I nor II is strong. |
C. | if both I and II are strong. |
D. | if only argument II is strong. |
Answer» E. | |
69. |
In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement : Should high tax rates be imposed on businesses?Argument I : No, High taxes discourage investments, thus reducing jobs and development.Argument II : Yes, Some businesses use clever accounting to save tax, so higher taxes will be a good counter measure. |
A. | if only argument II is strong |
B. | if neither argument I nor II is strong |
C. | if only argument I is strong |
D. | If both argument I and II are strong |
Answer» D. If both argument I and II are strong | |
70. |
Directions: The question given below consists of a passage, followed by three arguments I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are 'strong' arguments and which of the arguments are 'weak' arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.Passage: The Union Cabinet has cleared the proposal to suspend Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) proceedings for bank defaulters for six months with a provision to extend the period for up to one year. This will be applicable for NPAs (non-performing assets) after March 25, 2020. Along with that, there is an exclusion of COVID-19 related debt/defaults from the definition of default under IBC.Is this a good step from the Government?Arguments:I. Yes. The move will offer relief to a lot of companies affected by the COVID-19 crisis.II. No. This will encourage borrowers to default on their debt obligations and create a bad credit culture in society.III. No. This will adversely affect loan recoveries of Banks and increase stress on the Banking system. |
A. | Only I and II are strong |
B. | Only I and III are strong |
C. | Only II and III are strong |
D. | Only I is strong |
E. | All the arguments are strong |
Answer» C. Only II and III are strong | |
71. |
Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is.Statement: Should foreign TV shows be banned in India?Arguments:I. Yes. They depict a culture different from our own.II. No. Though there are many sources for entertainment, the foreign TV shows outweigh the other sources of entertainment and they are watched by a lot of people all over the country. |
A. | Only argument I is strong |
B. | Only argument II is strong |
C. | Either I or II is strong |
D. | Neither I nor II is strong and |
E. | Both I and II are strong |
Answer» C. Either I or II is strong | |
72. |
Given below is a statement, followed by two arguments, I and 2. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems t be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, supports(s) the given statements.Statement: Should lotteries operated by the state be stopped?Arguments 1: No, government will lose revenue.Arguments 2: yes, government should NOT promote gambling. |
A. | Only arguments 1 is strong |
B. | Only argument 2 is strong |
C. | Both arguments 1 and 2 are strong |
D. | Nether arguments 1 nor 2 is strong |
Answer» C. Both arguments 1 and 2 are strong | |
73. |
A statement is followed two arguments.Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement.Statement: How to avoid mosquito breeding at home?Arguments: I. Yes, we should remove clutter and stagnant water. We should use mosquito repellents and other gadgets to prevent mosquito bites.II. No, it is not possible to avert mosquitoes.They will come in particular season and breed.We can try preventive measures. |
A. | Both I and II are strong |
B. | Neither I nor II is strong |
C. | Only argument I is strong |
D. | Only argument II is strong |
Answer» D. Only argument II is strong | |
74. |
Given is a question followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.Question:Should children be taught to wisely use the Internet?Arguments:I. Yes, this way, they will know to use the Internet responsibly.II. No, they learn a lot by exploring on their own. |
A. | Both arguments I and II are strong. |
B. | Only argument II is strong. |
C. | Neither argument I nor II is strong. |
D. | Only argument I is strong. |
Answer» E. | |
75. |
In the question one statement is given, followed by two arguments, 1 and 2. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, If any, supports the given statements.Statement: Should new big industries be started in Delhi?Arguments 1: No, it will add to the city's pollutionArgument 2: Yes, it will provide employment opportunities. |
A. | Only arguments 1 is strong |
B. | Only arguments 2 is strong |
C. | Both arguments 1 and 2 are strong |
D. | Neither arguments 1 nor 2 is strong |
Answer» D. Neither arguments 1 nor 2 is strong | |
76. |
Can you tell which argument is strong?Statement:Should government take priority in linking rivers?Arguments:I. Yes, in the long run this will entirely eradicate water shortages in remote areas.II. No, we shouldn’t contaminate water and the rivers will naturally take its course. |
A. | Both I and II are strong |
B. | Only argument II is strong |
C. | Neither I nor II is strong. |
D. | Only argument I is strong. |
Answer» D. Only argument I is strong. | |
77. |
Given below is a statement followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong.Statement: Should carbohydrates be totally removed from our meals?Argument I: Yes, removing carbohydrates is very helpfulArgument II: No, removing carbohydrates from our meals won't affect much. |
A. | Both arguments are strong |
B. | None of the arguments is strong |
C. | Only argument II is strong |
D. | Only argument I is strong |
Answer» C. Only argument II is strong | |
78. |
In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement: Should mango export be banned to bring down domestic prices?Argument I: Yes, environmentalists and dieticians too encourage eating only local fruits.Argument II: No, exports bring in valuable foreign currency. |
A. | If only argument I is strong. |
B. | If only argument II is strong. |
C. | If both I and II are strong. |
D. | If neither I nor II is strong. |
Answer» C. If both I and II are strong. | |
79. |
In each of the questions below, a statement is given, followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which argument is 'stronger'.Statement: Should TV plays be banned?Argument:I. Yes, they show a very negative view of life situations that are influencing some sects of society to imitate the same behaviour.II. No, this is good interesting entertainment for older people. |
A. | Only argument I is strong. |
B. | Both I and II are strong. |
C. | Neither I nor II is strong. |
D. | Only argument II is strong. |
Answer» E. | |
80. |
Consider the given argument and decide which of the given assumptions is (are) implicit.Argument:The government had put advertisements and issued advisories to the public not to eat food from the roadside, as they are unhygienic.Assumptions:1. The government wants to stop roadside vendors business.2. The government wants to increase the profit of hotel owners. |
A. | Only assumption 2 is implicit. |
B. | Both 1 and 2 are implicit. |
C. | Neither 1 nor 2 is implicit. |
D. | Only assumption 1 is implicit. |
Answer» D. Only assumption 1 is implicit. | |
81. |
In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement: Should teachers be permitted to cane unruly children?Argument I: No, this will teach them that physical violence is an acceptable means of social behaviour.Argument II: Yes, children taught in a strict atmosphere are more successful. |
A. | only argument II is strong |
B. | neither argument I nor II is strong |
C. | both argument I and II are strong |
D. | only argument I is strong |
Answer» E. | |
82. |
A statement is followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement.Statement:Should Bihar ban alcohol?Argument:1. Yes, government should not promote alcohol and consider the development of state.2. No, government will lose large revenue from beaming and banning cannot be implemented 100%. |
A. | Only argument 1 is strong |
B. | Both argument 1 and 2 is strong |
C. | Only argument 2 is strong |
D. | Either argument 1 or 2 is strong |
Answer» B. Both argument 1 and 2 is strong | |
83. |
Direction: In question one or two statements are given, followed by three/ four Conclusions/Arguments. I, II, III and IV. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given Conclusions/Arguments can definitely be drawn from the given statements (s). Indicate your answer.Statement:Should little children be loaded with such heavy school bags?Arguments:I. Yes, a heavy bag means more knowledge.II. No, heavy school bags spoil the posture of the children.III. Yes, children need to be adapted for earning knowledge.IV. No, a heavy bag never ensures knowledge gathering. |
A. | I and III appear to be strong arguments |
B. | I and III are poor arguments |
C. | II and IV are strong arguments |
D. | I and IV are strong arguments |
Answer» D. I and IV are strong arguments | |
84. |
Consider the given statement and decide which of the given assumption(s) is (are) implicitStatement:The train fares have increased by 20% with immediate effect.Assumptions:I. People still prefer travelling by train despite the increase.II. Other modes of commutation may also increase their fares. |
A. | Only assumption I is implicit. |
B. | Neither assumption I nor II is implicit. |
C. | Both assumptions I and II are implicit. |
D. | Only assumption II is implicit. |
Answer» B. Neither assumption I nor II is implicit. | |
85. |
Direction: In the following question, there is a statement first, and two arguments, 1 and 2, are given below it. You have to consider which of the argument/arguments are influential in the statement by considering the given arguments. Choose the correct answer from the given alternatives.Statements: There is a shortage of water supply in all houses in metro cities. This is partly due to heavy water leakage in pipelines.Argument 1: Maintenance should be 24 × 7 and stop the water leakage.Argument 2: We should pump more water at the same or less expense. |
A. | Argument 1 is effective |
B. | Argument 2 is effective |
C. | Arguments 1 and 2 are effective |
D. | Neither argument 1 nor 2 is effective |
Answer» B. Argument 2 is effective | |
86. |
A question is given below and followed by two arguments. Determine which argument is/are strong in the context of the question.Question: Should the government ban the use of clothes other than cotton clothes during the summer season?Argument 1: Yes, during summer, cotton clothes provide maximum coolness to our body.Argument 2: No, citizens have the right to wear any type of clothing in any season. |
A. | Only argument 1 is strong. |
B. | Only argument 2 is strong. |
C. | Either argument 1 or argument 2 is strong. |
D. | Both arguments 1 and 2 are not strong. |
Answer» C. Either argument 1 or argument 2 is strong. | |
87. |
A statement is followed by two arguments. Decide which of the argument is/are strong with respect to the statement.Statement:Should income tax be abolished in developed countries?Arguments:1. Yes, it will motivate to earn more.2. No, people must learn to share their wealth for the betterment of other people. |
A. | Either argument 1 or 2 is strong |
B. | Only argument 1 is strong |
C. | Neither 1 nor 2 is strong |
D. | Only argument 2 is strong |
Answer» E. | |
88. |
In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement: Should learning self defence be made compulsory for girl students?Argument I: No, there is a risk that they will misuse these skills to bully others.Argument II: Yes, in an environment where cases of assault on women are increasing, self defence training becomes one essential part of women safety. |
A. | If only argument II is strong |
B. | If only argument I is strong |
C. | If neither argument I nor II is strong |
D. | If both argument I and II are strong |
Answer» B. If only argument I is strong | |
89. |
A statement is followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement.Statement:Should LED lamps be banned?Arguments:I. Yes, they emit blue light which is hazardous to the environment as well as human beings.II. No, they are economical and better light than CFL’s. |
A. | Both I and II are strong |
B. | Only argument I is strong |
C. | Only argument II is strong |
D. | Neither I nor II is strong and |
Answer» D. Neither I nor II is strong and | |
90. |
Consider the following :Statement: Should there be recruitment in Government service on the basis of past academic performance rather than through competitive examinations?Arguments:I. Yes, it will be beneficial for those candidates who are unable to bear the expenses of competitive examinations.II. No, the past academic performance cannot be made the basis of recruitment because there is no uniformity in the assessment by the Universities.Which one is / are the strong argument/s? |
A. | Only I |
B. | Only II |
C. | Neither I, nor II |
D. | Both I and II |
Answer» C. Neither I, nor II | |
91. |
Given is a question followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.Are smart phones addictive?Arguments:I. Yes, once you are used to smart phones, you tend to spend more time on mobiles ignoring personal time.II. No, they offer additional features that are very necessary for modern day lifestyle. |
A. | Only argument I is strong. |
B. | Neither argument I nor II is strong. |
C. | Only argument II is strong. |
D. | Both arguments I and II are strong. |
Answer» E. | |
92. |
In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement : Should local train tickets be subsidized?Argument I : No, in an environment where locals trains are overcrowded, subsidy will worsen the situation.Argument II : Yes, Local trains reduce number of vehicles on the road, thus reducing pollution, reduce costs and travel time. |
A. | If neither argument I nor II is strong |
B. | If only argument II is strong. |
C. | If only argument I is strong. |
D. | If both argument I and II are strong |
Answer» E. | |