Which is a good alternative instead of having one zero argument const – McqOptions

MCQOPTIONS

1.	Which is a good alternative instead of having one zero argument constructor and one single argument constructor with default argument?
A.	No constructor defined
B.	One default value constructor
C.	Defining the default constructor
D.	Using one constructor with two arguments
Answer» C. Defining the default constructor

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

Which is a good alternative instead of having one zero argument constructor and one single argument constructor with default argument?
Which is the correct statement for default constructors?
If there is a constructor with all the default arguments and arguments are not passed then _________________
Which constructor definition will produce a compile time error?
Which constructor among the following will be called if a call is made like className(5,’a’);?
If the constructors are overloaded by using the default arguments, which problem may arise?
How many parameters must be passed if only the following prototype is given to a constructor?Prototype: className(int x, int y, int z=0);
Which is the correct syntax for using default arguments with the constructor?
Can a class have more than one function with all the default arguments?
Which among the following can be used in place of default constructor?