The President issued an order well under his powers and under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution. If instead of the promugulation of the order, the Parliament would have removed Article 370 from the Indian Constitution, what would have been the consequence?

The Law will further solidify the Presidential order of 1954.

The law would be declared unconstitutional.

The Law will fail the test in the court of Law.

The Law will result in independence of J&k.

The President issued an order well under his powers and under Article

1.	The President issued an order well under his powers and under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution. If instead of the promugulation of the order, the Parliament would have removed Article 370 from the Indian Constitution, what would have been the consequence?
A.	The law would be declared unconstitutional.
B.	The Law will fail the test in the court of Law.
C.	The Law will result in independence of J&k.
D.	The Law will further solidify the Presidential order of 1954.
Answer» D. The Law will further solidify the Presidential order of 1954.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

The President issued an order well under his powers and under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution. If instead of the promugulation of the order, the Parliament would have removed Article 370 from the Indian Constitution, what would have been the consequence?
The new order promugulated by the President has removed the legislature of J&K. The New UT is governed on the lines of _______________?
Ram Singh is a permanent resident of J and K and is notified under the Scheduled Caste category. He applies for the job of DSP Police whose recruitment exam was undertaken in February 2019 and interviews are to be conducted in the month of December 2019. Ram Singh was not selected eventually as the government did not provide him reservation benefits. Decide.
The People of J and K had the right to have say in interference of legislative law making power by Union of India by virtue of ______________ the Indian Constitution.
The legislative assembly of Jammu and Kashmir passes a law against the 100th Amendment Act of Parliament of India passed in 2015 in its session held on 20-1-20. The Speaker of the House attends the session and calls it path-breaking in the ethos of federal democracy where the legislative Assembly can pass a law showing true spirit of dissent against the Union.
The Commission of Law gives a direction to government to postpone all the elections of state governments which were due after May 2019 to May 2024 to fulfill its mission of One Nation One Election. Which of the following issues may arise in case it is actually brought into action?
The government of Haryana wishes to conduct simultaneous polls in Assembly and Municipal bodies of the state. Which of the reasons is the best that can be given by the civic bodies legally to stop such an exercise?
What can be the odd one out of the shortcomings of the Simultaneous polls being carried by poll bodies?
Which of the below best describes an odd outcome of One-Nation One Poll?
Which of the following best supports the idea of One Nation- One election in a democratic setup like India?

The President issued an order well under his powers and under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution. If instead of the promugulation of the order, the Parliament would have removed Article 370 from the Indian Constitution, what would have been the consequence?

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

Reply to Comment