MCQOPTIONS
Bookmark
Saved Bookmarks
→
Hash Tables Chaining with Binary Trees Multiple Choice
→
General
→
Separate chaining is easier to implement as compar...
1.
Separate chaining is easier to implement as compared to open addressing.
A.
true
B.
false
Answer» B. false
Show Answer
Discussion
No Comment Found
Post Comment
Related MCQs
In open addressing the hash table can never become full.
Separate chaining is easier to implement as compared to open addressing.
Which of the following technique stores data separately in case of a collision?
What is the disadvantage of BST over the hash table?
What is the advantage of a hash table over BST?
What is the time complexity of the delete function in the hash table using a binary tree?
What is the time complexity of the search function in a hash table using a binary tree?
What is the time complexity of insert function in a hash table using a binary tree?
What is the disadvantage of hashing with chaining?
What is the advantage of hashing with chaining?
Reply to Comment
×
Name
*
Email
*
Comment
*
Submit Reply
Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies. Read
Cookie Policy
Reject
Allow cookies
