Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract. Facts of the Problem : Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance, but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?

The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in open market.

Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.

Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.

The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.

Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties m

1.	Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract. Facts of the Problem : Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance, but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?
A.	Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.
B.	Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.
C.	The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in open market.
D.	The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.
Answer» C. The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in open market.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

Legal Principle : A contract becomes void if the performance of the same becomes impossible under the circumstances. Facts of the Problem : Ravi offers to buy the horse of Arjun for a price of Rs. 10 lakhs. Arjun, not knowing that the horse is already dead, agrees to the contract. Later the truth about the death of the hose is discovered. Is the contract valid?
Legal Principle : With the counter proposal made by the party, the original offer ceases to exist. Facts of the Problem : Badal offered to sell his car to Pranav at the price of Rs. 3 lakhs. Pranav replies that he is ready to buy the car at Rs. 2.5 lakhs only. Badal refuses to sell at that price. Later, Pranav goes to Badal with Rs. 3 lakhs to buy the car. Is the offer to Rs. 3 lakhs still valid?
Legal Principle : Any contract made for an unlawful consideration is void in law. Facts of the Problem : Gagan enters into a contract with Nikhil to murder his wife, Preity for a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs. Gagan agrees to pay the amount to Nikhil in return of the murder. Is it a valid contract?
Legal Principle : A contract enters into by the use of misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the other party. Facts of the Problem : Lalit with an intention to deceive Rahul into buying his cement factory, falsely stated that his factory is capable of producing 2,000 kg of cement per day. However, in reality, the factory only has a production capacity of 500 kg/ day. Rahul gets induced and agrees to buy the factory. Is it a valid contract?
Legal Principle : The notice for auction or sale of goods is only an invitation to offer, and not an offer in itself under the law of contract. Facts of the Problem : Uday puts up an advertisement in front of his house of selling the house at the price of Rs. 50 lakhs. Saif sees that advertisement and goes to Uday with the money to buy the house. Uday refuses to sell the house to Saif. Saif sues Uday for the breach of the contract. Decide?
Legal Principle : A contract to do an impossible act is void ab initio. Facts of the Problem :Tarun enters into a contract with Karan to make his dead pet dog alive again through the use of magic. Karan agrees to pay him Rs. 20,000 for the act. Later, when Tarun tries to bring back the dog to life, Karan refuses to pay the money to him. Tarun sues Karan for damages due to non-payment of the agreed consideration by him. Decide the case?
Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract. Facts of the Problem : Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance, but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?
Legal Principle : A contract which is made to restraint the legal proceedings is void under the law. Facts of the Problem :Raj is a leading barrister of the city. His friend Nitin enters into a contract with him that he would not in represent Jatin in any law suit for the next one year. After two months, Raj represents Jatin in a civil suit. Nitin sues Raj for the breach of the contract. What would be the legal outcome of the suit against Raj?
Legal Principle : A contract whose consideration is uncertain, or incapable of being made certain is void in law. Facts of the Problem : Amit has a stable of racing horses. He owns many horses of various exotic as well as indigenous breeds. He agrees to sell a horse of exotic breed for a price of Rs. 5 lakh to Arun. Arun also agrees to pay the price for the horse, but when the time of delivery of the horse came, there is confusion as regards which horse is to be given under the contract. A case is filed in the civil court for the delivery of the horse by Arun. What would be the outcome of the suit?
Legal Principle : A contract with a minor would be void if the other party knew about the minority. Facts of the Problem : Hitesh is a leading seller of the computer hardware items in the city. His sixteen years old son has Rohan as his best friend. Rohan is also of the same age. Hitesh knowing the age of Rohan entered into a contract with him for a set of laptops for a sum of Rs. 20 lakhs to him. When Hitesh sent the consignment of the laptops, Rohan refused to take them and dishonoured the contract. Hitesh sues Rohan for the damages suffered by him. Decide the legal outcome of the situation?

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

Reply to Comment