It is less complex to prove the closure properties over regular langua – McqOptions

MCQOPTIONS

1.	It is less complex to prove the closure properties over regular languages using
A.	NFA
B.	DFA
C.	PDA
D.	Can‚Äö√Ñ√∂‚àö√ë‚àö¬•t be said
Answer» B. DFA

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

The total number of states to build the given language using DFA:L= {w | w has exactly 2 a’s and at least 2 b’s}
Predict the number of transitions required to automate the following language using only 3 states:L= {w | w ends with 00}
L1= {w | w does not contain the string tr }L2= {w | w does contain the string tr}Given ∑= {t, r}, The difference of the minimum number of states required to form L1 and L2?
John is asked to make an automaton which accepts a given string for all the occurrence of ‘1001’ in it. How many number of transitions would John use such that, the string processing application works?
PREDICT_THE_NUMBER_OF_TRANSITIONS_REQUIRED_TO_AUTOMATE_THE_FOLLOWING_LANGUAGE_USING_ONLY_3_STATES:?$
The_total_number_of_states_to_build_the_given_language_using_DFA:$
L1= {w | w does not contain the string tr ?
Which among the following is not an application of FSM?
Which among the following can be an example of application of finite state machine(FSM)?
Which of the following do we use to form an NFA from a regular expression?