In a case the accused was convicted u/s. 325 I.P.C. and was sentenced by trial Court to two months R.I. with fine of Rs. 500 for offence under S. 325 I.P.C. The trial pended for seven long years.

the sentence is improper for an offence under Section 325 I.P.C

the sentence is proper and appropriate

the accused should be sentenced to fine and imprisonment till the rising of Court

In a case the accused was convicted u/s. 325 I.P.C. and was sentenced

1.	In a case the accused was convicted u/s. 325 I.P.C. and was sentenced by trial Court to two months R.I. with fine of Rs. 500 for offence under S. 325 I.P.C. The trial pended for seven long years.
A.	the sentence is improper for an offence under Section 325 I.P.C
B.	the sentence is proper and appropriate
C.	the accused should be sentenced to fine and imprisonment till the rising of Court
D.	both (A) and (C)
Answer» E.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

One Mrs. Komai bought a car on the name of her daughter, Kiran, who is a minor, and got the insurance policy transferred on her name (Mrs. Komal). The car met with an accident on two counts and she file for a claim on both the counts, from the insurance agency. She acknowledged the receipt of the money as Kiran. The insurance company her prosecuted under Section 467 of the IPC alleging fraud on the appellant’s part?
Abetment of any offence, if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment is dealt under-
The basic principle which runs through Section 32 to 38 of IPC is that:
In the case of People’s Union for democratic Rights v. UOI:
Right of disabled employee as equal citizens not to be defeated by their superiors andthey have no right to defeat their lawful rights:
Which of the following does not attract Section 34 of the IPC?
In case of A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 was foundconflicting with the two Articles:
Dishonest misappropriation of property, knowing that it was in possession of a deceased person at his death and that it has not since been in the possession of any person legally entitled to it is dealt under-
Several persons assemble at the door of the house of one K and the appellant struck a blow with a kencha which fell on the left thigh of a workman working in the house of one K whom the appellant and others wanted to attack, and as the appellant struck at the very first person who opened the door and that was how that came to receive the injury.
148 Criminal breach of trust is dealt under-

In a case the accused was convicted u/s. 325 I.P.C. and was sentenced by trial Court to two months R.I. with fine of Rs. 500 for offence under S. 325 I.P.C. The trial pended for seven long years.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

Reply to Comment