From an interfacial energy standpoint it is favourable for a precipita – McqOptions

MCQOPTIONS

1.	From an interfacial energy standpoint it is favourable for a precipitate to be surrounded by____
A.	High-energy coherent interfaces
B.	High-energy incoherent interfaces
C.	Low-energy incoherent interfaces
D.	Low-energy coherent interfaces
Answer» E.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

If the dislocation network (Burger and Interfacial) glides into the FCC crystal it results in a transformation of_____
The formation of martensite in steel and other alloy systems occurs by the motion of_______
Under which circumstances does a glissile semi coherent interface gets formed?
Calculate the punching stress P, if the constrained misfit is given as 1/3 and the shear modulus of the matrix is given as 5Pa?
What kind of misfit arises if the inclusion is the wrong size for the hole it is located?
If the precipitate and inclusion have different elastic moduli the elastic strain energy is no longer shape independent.
If is the shear modulus of the matrix and V is the volume of the unconstrained hole in the matrix and the elastic energy does not depend on the shape of the precipitate, if so, calculate the elastic strain energy? (Assume the poissons ratio to be 1/3 and Misfit- )
Which among the following are most unlikely to arise when a second-phase particle is located on a grain boundary?
From an interfacial energy standpoint it is favourable for a precipitate to be surrounded by____
Ag-rich zones in an AI-4 atomic % Ag alloy is an example of GP zone (Guinier and Preston).