Comment on the following pieces of code. – McqOptions

MCQOPTIONS

1.	Comment on the following pieces of code.
A.	A and B are equivalent
B.	A and B provides different functionality
C.	Runtime Error in A
D.	Exception in B
Answer» B. A and B provides different functionality

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

Is this bean configuration correct?
Declaring Beans using:-Ways to declare bean from a static field?Declaring a bean from a static field requires a built-in factory bean FieldRetrievingFactoryBean and fully qualified field name or instance field is specified in the list property.As an alternative to specifying the field name in the staticField property explicitly, you can set it as the bean name of FieldRetrievingFactoryBean.Is this bean configuration metadata correct?
Comment on the following pieces of code.
What will be the output of following code?
Declaring Beans using:-Ways to declare bean from a static field?
We can combine target Object and propertyPath properties as bean name/id of PropertyPathFactoryBean.
Declaring Beans using:-Ways to declare bean from a static field?Declaring a bean from a static field requires a built-in factory bean FieldRetrievingFactoryBean and fully qualified field name or instance field is specified in the list property.
One factory class can also hold more than one factory method.
Declaring Beans using:-Ways to declare bean from a static field?Declaring a bean from a static field requires a built-in factory bean FieldRetrievingFactoryBean and fully qualified field name or instance field is specified in the list property.As an alternative to specifying the field name in the staticField property explicitly, you can set it as the bean name of FieldRetrievingFactoryBean.
Bean’s naming convention:-starts with lowercase, camelcase from then on.?