Below is a statement followed by some arguments. Assume the given statement to be true even if it is at variance with commonly known facts and decide which of the given arguments fully elucidates the given statement.Statement:Should dyslexic children only be taught at home by parents?Argument:I. Yes, home is the only safe environment for dyslexic children.II. No, suitable support mechanisms need to be established anywhere at home or outside.

Both arguments are explanatory.

Both arguments I or II are not explanatory.

Below is a statement followed by some arguments. Assume the given stat

1.	Below is a statement followed by some arguments. Assume the given statement to be true even if it is at variance with commonly known facts and decide which of the given arguments fully elucidates the given statement.Statement:Should dyslexic children only be taught at home by parents?Argument:I. Yes, home is the only safe environment for dyslexic children.II. No, suitable support mechanisms need to be established anywhere at home or outside.
A.	Both arguments are explanatory.
B.	Both arguments I or II are not explanatory.
C.	Only II is explanatory.
D.	Only I is explanatory.
Answer» D. Only I is explanatory.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

A statement is followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the statement.Statement:There is more wastage of water due to water purifiers.Arguments: I. Yes, houses should adopt ways to reuse the excess water produced from the filters so that it can be given back to the land.II. No it enters the sewage system and automatically goes back.
Direction: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.Statement: Flood is a natural disaster that is caused due to the accumulation of excessive water in a region. This is often an outcome of heavy rainfall. Many regions also face flood due to the overflow of river or ocean water, breaking of dams and melting of snow.Argument:I. Many people and animals lose their lives because of severe flash floods. Many others get injured and are infected by various diseases.II. Water accumulated at places for days result in the breeding of mosquitoes and other insects that are the cause of various diseases such as malaria and dengue.
In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.Statement: Should prison term of those criminals who have shown good behaviour be reduced?Argument I: No, if they are freed they will again commit crimes.Argument II: Yes, this will incentivise others to show good behaviour.
A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which arguments are stronger in relation to the question.Question:Do dogs love selflessly?Arguments:1. Yes, dogs are very loyal and loving; Having a pet dog at home creates a very friendly atmosphere.2. No, this is just a human thinking; Rather, dogs need the freedom to live a life without human intervention.
Consider the argument and decide which of the given assumptions is / are implicit.Argument:Today is Sunday.Assumption:1. Tomorrow is Monday.2. Today is a holiday.
Consider the statement and the following arguments and decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the 4 statements.Statement: To save the city from air pollution, should citizens use more public transport?Arguments: I. Yes, everybody should only use public transport unless it is an emergencyII. No, it is not a very good idea to use public transport as it might not be convenient for all
According to one statement, two arguments are given. Decide which argument is stronger with respect to the statement.Statement:Should the Indian government stop spending large amounts of money on border security?Argument:I. Yes, it is a waste of public moneyII. No, it is a national security issue
In making decision about important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between "Strong" arguments and "Weak arguments". "Strong" arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. "Weak" arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. Question given below is followed by two arguments numbered a), b). You have to decide which of the argument(s) is/are "Strong" and indicate your answer accordingly.Statement:Should the Government close Telugu medium schools?Arguments:a) Yes, this will help the Government to save money on salaries to teachers. Telugu medium schools?
A statement is followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is are strong with respect to statement.Statement:There should be strict penalty for people using mobile phone while driving.Arguments:I. Yes, it will ensure that the number of accident due to mobile phone usage gets avoided.II. No, it is difficult to implement as people are used to using cell phones anywhere.
Consider the given argument and decide which of the given assumptions is (are) implicit.Argument:The year 2020 is a leap year.Assumptions:1. February will have 29 days in 2020.2. The year 2017 is not a leap year.

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

Reply to Comment