“Reservations are not a violation of equality” explain this statement
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Reservation\xa0is\xa0not\xa0against the Constitution. the\xa0equality\xa0you are talking about is just a legal or juridic\xa0equality, which doesn\’t take into account justice. Secondly, the Constitution itself provides for\xa0reservation\xa0policy in favor of certain sections (Article 15(4), 15(5), 16(3), 16(4) ).\xa0It\xa0does\xa0not\xa0violates the right to equality\xa0but yes sometimes the people of general groups fail to get benefits because of\xa0reservation.\xa0The person whose economic status is low\xa0should\xa0be provided with\xa0reservation.\xa0Reservation should not be there\xa0as it discourages the non-reserved class. So this requires some changes in our constitution too to safeguard the lower income people and\xa0not\xa0the highly non reserved class.