Key Differences Between Fundamental Rights and Directive PrinciplesThe difference between fundamental rights and directive principles are discussed in the points given below:\tFundamental Rights can be understood as the basic freedoms enjoyed by every citizen of the country, which is recognized by society and sanctioned by the State. Conversely, When laws and policies are framed by the central or state government, certain principles are considered, called as directive principles of state policy.\tFundamental rights are defined under Part III of the Constitution, comprising articles from 12 to 35. As against, Directive Principles of State Policy are embodied under Part IV of the Constitution, containing articles from 36 to 51.\tFundamental rights are negative in nature, in the sense that it prevents the government from doing certain things. In contrast, Directive Principles are positive, as it requires the government to do certain things.\tFundamental Rights are justiciable, as they can be enforced, whereas the directive principles are non-justiciable, in that, they are not enforceable in the court of law.\tWhile fundamental rights establish political democracy, directive principles set social and economic democracy.\tFundamental Rights are legal sanctions, but directive principles are moral and political sanctions.\tFundamental Rights follows an individualistic approach, and so it promotes individual welfare. On the contrary, Directive Principles promotes the welfare of the community as a whole.