For some sparse graph an adjacency list is more space efficient agains – McqOptions

MCQOPTIONS

1.	For some sparse graph an adjacency list is more space efficient against an adjacency matrix.
A.	True
B.	False
Answer» B. False

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

What would be the time complexity of the BFS traversal of a graph with n vertices and n1.25 edges?
What would be the time complexity of the following function which adds an edge between two vertices i and j, with some weight ‘weigh’ to the graph having V vertices?
To create an adjacency list C++’s map container can be used.
Complete the given snippet of code for the adjacency list representation of a weighted directed graph.
Space complexity for an adjacency list of an undirected graph having large values of V (vertices) and E (edges) is __________
For the given conditions, which of the following is in the correct order of increasing space requirement?i) Undirected, no weightii) Directed, no weightiii) Directed, weightediv) Undirected, weighted
TO_CREATE_AN_ADJACENCY_LIST_C++‚ÄÖ√Ñ√∂‚ÀÖ√Ë‚ÀÖ¬•S_MAP_CONTAINER_CAN_BE_USED.?$#
In which case adjacency list is preferred in front of an adjacency matrix?
vertex, vertex
For the given conditions, which of the following is in the correct order of increasing space requirement?