For a governing equation, what does one conclude from the weak formula – McqOptions

MCQOPTIONS

1.	For a governing equation, what does one conclude from the weak formulation if it does not contain boundary integral involving weight function?
A.	Integration by parts is used
B.	Integration by parts is not used
C.	The weight function is as a primary variable
D.	The weight function is to be made continuous across inter-element boundaries
Answer» C. The weight function is as a primary variable

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related MCQs

What is the physical interpretation of the weight function w3 in the following weak form of the continuity equation?- ew3 (( frac{ partial v_x}{ partial x}+ frac{ partial v_y}{ partial y}) )dxdy=0
In matrix algebra, if a matrix is positive definite, then all its eigenvalues are greater than zero.
For the vector form of the finite element model of momentum and continuity equations M +K11 +K12P=0 what is the order of matrix F if the order of M is 2n x 2n?
For the vector form of the finite element model of momentum and continuity equations M +K11 +K12P=0, what is the correct expression for mass matrix M?
Which equation is the correct vector form of the finite element model of momentum and continuity equations in the flow domain?
Which option is not correct concerning the velocity variables, vx and vy in the weak form of the momentum and continuity equation?
Which option is not correct concerning the pressure variable, P in the weak form of the momentum and continuity equation?
If a governing equation represents volume change in an element, then the weight function in its weak form must be like a force that causes the volume change.
Using constitutive relations, what is the value of xyif =0.3 and v=4xy-6y?
Using constitutive relations, what is the value of xxif =0.3 and v=4x?