Civil disobedience movement in different regions and its effects and limitations
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Limitations of Civil Disobedience movement\tMuslim political groups were lukewarm in their response to the Civil Disobedience Movement.\tAfter the decline of the Non Cooperation -Khilafat movement started, there was a atmosphere of suspicion and distrust between communities.\tAlienated from the Congress large sections of Muslims could not respond to the call for a united struggle.\tMany Muslim leaders and intellectualls expressed their concern about the status of Muslims as a minority within India.\tThey feared that the culture and identity of minorities would be submerged under the domination of Hindu majority.\tDalit participation was limited. They began organiging themselves, demanding reserved seats in educational institutions, and a separate electorate.\tDr. B.R Ambedkar, who organised the datits into the depressed Classes Assocition in 1930, clashed with Mahatma Gandhi at the Second Round Table Conference by demanding separate electorates for dalits.\tAmbedkar ultimately accepted Gandhiji\’s position and the result was the Poona Pact of September 1932.